[1]张道军,朱堂友,雷霞,等.改良“W”形切口与腋中线大切口治疗腋臭的疗效比较[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2016,(12):1293-1294,1300.[doi:10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.201603056]
 ZHANG Dao-jun,ZHU Tang-you,LEI Xia,et al.Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Improved "W" Shape Incision and Axillary Midline Incision for Bromhidrosis[J].The Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology,2016,(12):1293-1294,1300.[doi:10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.201603056]
点击复制

改良“W”形切口与腋中线大切口治疗腋臭的疗效比较
分享到:

《中国皮肤性病学杂志》[ISSN:1001-7089/CN:61-1197/R]

卷:
期数:
2016年12期
页码:
1293-1294,1300
栏目:
皮肤外科
出版日期:
2016-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Improved "W" Shape Incision and Axillary Midline Incision for Bromhidrosis
作者:
张道军朱堂友雷霞张英
第三军医大学第三附属医院,重庆 400040
Author(s):
ZHANG Dao-junZHU Tang-youLEI XiaZHANG Ying
The Third Affiliated Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400040, China
关键词:
腋臭 改良“W”形切口 腋中线大切口
Keywords:
Bromhidrosis Improved "W" shape incision Axillary midline incision
分类号:
R 758.41+1
DOI:
10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.201603056
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的 比较改良“W”形切口与腋中线大切口治疗腋臭的效果。方法 选择2012年1月- 2015年12月在我科就诊的腋臭患者,对应用改良“W”形切口和腋中线大切口的临床效果进行比 较分析。 结果 腋中线大切口腋臭患者治疗有效率97.30%,改良“W”形切口法患者有效率 96.00%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 腋中线大切口术后并发症发生率多于改良“W ”形切口术后并发症发生率(P<0.05)。 结论 改良”W”形切口法治疗腋臭术后发生 血肿、皮瓣坏死的风险小,伤口感染发生率低,预后瘢痕不明显,是目前临床治疗腋臭的较好方法 。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacy between improved "W" shape incision and axillary midline incision for bromhidrosis.Methods Therapeutic efficacies were compared between improved "W" shape incision and axillary midline incision for bromhidrosis treated in our Department from January 2012 to December 2015.Results The effective rates in patients treated with axillary midline large incision were similar to those treated with improved "W" shape incision(97.3% vs.96%).But more complications occurred following axillary midline incision in comparison with improved "W" shape incision(P<0.05).Conclusion In addition to the unnoticeable scar, improved "W" shape method has less risk of hematoma, skin flap necrosis, and infection.It is an optional method for bromhidrosis.

参考文献/References:

[1] James AG,Austin CJ,Cox DS,et al.Microbiological and biochemical origins of human axillary odour[J].FEMS Microbiol Ecol,2013,83( 3):527-540.
[2] 苏月红, 张超.腋横纹小切口的腋臭清除术[J].中国临床保健杂志,2010,(5):38.
[3] Li H, Wang B, zhang Z, et al. A erfined sugircal treatment modality for bromhidrosis:double W incision approach with tumescent technique [J].Dermatol surg, 2009, 35(8):1258-1262.
[4] 王淑琴,谭谦,周宏礽,等.A 型肉毒毒素局部注射治疗腋臭[J].中华医学美学美容杂 志,2010,16(6):416-417.
[5] 陶小凤,赵达安.介绍一种腋臭改良术[J].实用美容整形外科杂志, 2000,11(3):166.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘样满,王国安,陈俊杰,等.三种不同切口下大汗腺修剪术治疗腋臭的疗效比较[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2016,(10):1073.[doi:10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.201509018]
 LIU Yang-man,WANG Guo-an,CHEN Jun-jie,et al.Clinical Evaluation of Cutting off Apocrine Sweat under Three kinds of Incision for Axillary Osmidrosis[J].The Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology,2016,(12):1073.[doi:10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.201509018]
[2]贾瑜,栾兴玉,吴音,等.小切口结合微孔引流手术治疗腋臭86例临床观察[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2017,(08):916.[doi:10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.201702035]
 JIA Yu,LUAN Xing-yu,WU Yin,et al.Clinical Observation on the Treatment of 86 Cases of Bromhidrosis with Small Incision Combined with Micro Drainage Surgery[J].The Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology,2017,(12):916.[doi:10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.201702035]
[3]杨万军,刘丽华,吴思.射频与手术治疗腋臭的疗效比较[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2017,(12):1324.[doi:10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.201705077]
 YANG Wan-jun,LIU Li-hua,WU Si.Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Radiofrequency and Surgery for Axillary Osmidrosis[J].The Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology,2017,(12):1324.[doi:10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.201705077]
[4]刘影,张硕,杨玲,等.黄金微针射频治疗腋臭83例疗效分析[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2020,(10):1209.[doi:10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.202003034]
 LIU Ying,ZHANG Shuo,YANG Ling,et al.Efficacy Analysis of 83 Cases of Axillary Osmidrosis Treated with Gold Micro Needle Radio-Frequency[J].The Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology,2020,(12):1209.[doi:10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.202003034]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
[通讯作者] 张英,E-mail:zhangying@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-12-20